Arctic Crisis: Polar Bears, Ice, and Fat Under Threat – Vital Ecosystems at Risk!

At the point where the Churchill River flows into the vast Hudson Bay in Canada, biologist Geoff York is on the lookout for polar bears. York, who is the senior director of research and policy at Polar Bears International, notes that this area is undergoing a significant reduction in both fat and ice due to climate change.

The number of polar bears in the Western Hudson Bay, which is one of the most vulnerable among the 20 polar bear populations, has decreased to around 600. This figure is roughly half of what it was four decades ago. York’s recent research, conducted with a team of multidisciplinary scientists, indicates that without substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, this polar bear population could completely vanish by the century’s end.

This region serves as a critical gateway to the Arctic, and it faces broader ecological threats beyond the decline in polar bear numbers. The Arctic waters are warming, causing the sea ice to melt earlier each year and the open waters to persist for longer periods. Julienne Stroeve, a sea ice scientist at the University of Manitoba, explains that the entire marine ecosystem is closely linked to the seasonal patterns of the sea ice cover.

The premature melting of sea ice not only raises the overall water temperature but also alters the blooming patterns of algae. This, in turn, affects the plankton that feed on these algae, and the impact cascades up the food chain, eventually affecting fish, beluga whales, seals, and polar bears, according to scientists.

York, speaking in August from a bobbing 12-foot Zodiac boat, describes witnessing a shift in the Arctic ecosystem to resemble more of a southern open ocean system. This transformation is characterized by a move from high-fat plankton, which supports species like beluga whales and polar bears, to low-fat plankton, culminating in jellyfish dominating the end of the food chain.

In this environment, fat is a crucial resource. “To survive in the Arctic, you need to either be fat, live on fat, or both,” remarks Kristin Laidre, a marine mammal scientist at the University of Washington who specializes in Arctic species. The polar bear, emblematic of both climate change and an area warming at four times the global average rate, epitomizes this necessity for fat. York points out that the milk produced by mother polar bears, which he has observed nursing their young on the rocks outside Churchill, Manitoba—known as the world’s polar bear capital—is composed of 30% fat.

“It’s comparable to the richest of heavy whipping cream,” York explains, “which is why cubs that are born the size of a fist in January can weigh 20 to 25 pounds by March.” However, fewer cubs are being born or surviving their first year as their mothers lack sufficient fat reserves to become pregnant or sustain them.

Polar bears heavily rely on the sea ice in spring to hunt their preferred prey—high-fat seals, particularly young ones. In Hudson Bay, unlike other polar bear habitats, the sea ice naturally disappears during the summer, cutting off the bears’ food supply. While this has always been the case, the ice-free period is now starting earlier and lasting longer, according to York and Stroeve.

Consequently, many polar bears face starvation. Recent studies have shown that polar bears that attempt to find food on land—hunting caribou, birds, or scavenging human garbage—expend so much energy that it might be less taxing to simply endure hunger. York notes that today’s bears are forced to spend up to a month longer on shore compared to their ancestors, drastically extending their fasting period.

In some years, polar bears approach a critical starvation threshold of 180 days. Although they are adept at conserving fat, losing about 7% of their body weight during lean periods, the reduced sea ice coverage—which has been declining since 1979—is pushing them towards a precarious survival boundary.

A study by Stroeve and York found that if the planet warms another 1.3 to 1.4 degrees Celsius, the polar bears in Western Hudson Bay are likely to pass a point of no return due to excessive hunger, leading to the probable extinction of this population. Current projections suggest a warming of approximately 1.5 to 1.7 degrees Celsius by the end of the century based on existing efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

“These populations will definitely not survive,” Stroeve asserts. The Hudson Bay area, home to about 4,500 polar bears and 55,000 beluga whales, represents a significant biomass of fat-dependent large mammals. However, they are losing ground to the overwhelming weight of emitted carbon dioxide—154 million pounds every minute.

It’s not just polar bears that are affected. Laidre from the University of Washington points out that small water zooplankton called copepods, crucial to the diet of bowhead whales, are also at risk. These copepods depend on smaller plant plankton, which are undergoing changes in blooming cycles and species composition, resulting in less lipid-rich newcomers.

While life persists in the North, the characteristics of its inhabitants are increasingly resembling those found in southern waters. What’s occurring in Hudson Bay today may soon be a reality further north, warns Stroeve, highlighting the broader implications of these changes.

For Stroeve, the plight of the polar bears is particularly poignant. “Seeing these animals thrive in such harsh conditions is truly joyous,” she says. “It’s disheartening to think that our actions could prevent their survival.”

___

Read more of AP’s climate coverage at

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on X at

___